SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 25316

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
AJITSING AMARSING RAJPUT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
MR RITURAJ M MEENA(3224), MR MEET THAKKAR, APP

ORAL ORDER

[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

[2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11200010240381 of 2024 registered with Valsad City Police Station, Valsad for the offences punishable under Sections 306 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act .

[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and the allegation against the applicant is that he has made a demand of Rs.20 lakh from the father of the deceased. It is submitted that during a telephonic conversation on February 5, 2024, the complainant categorically denied acceptance of the marriage to the applicant, a fact supported by their WhatsApp chats. The learned judge failed to recognize that the complainant did not accept the love marriage between the applicant and the deceased, leading to the impugned complaint, which alleges false statements and claims of dowry. The applicant and the deceased had a happy m


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top