Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
TUSHAR @ LUCKY JAYESHBHAI VAJANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant accused of blackmail (Para 2) |
| 2. defense claims innocence (Para 3) |
| 3. opposition argues serious charges (Para 4) |
| 4. factors for bail consideration (Para 5) |
| 5. consideration of case aspects (Para 6) |
| 6. bail jurisprudence emphasized (Para 7) |
| 7. bail granted with conditions (Para 8) |
| 8. conditions for bail outlined (Para 9 , 12) |
| 9. bail bond execution (Para 10) |
| 10. trial court's independence (Para 11) |
ORAL ORDER
[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
[2.0] The present application is the successive bail application, filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11208001240083 of 2024 registered with Mahila Police Station, Rajkot City for the offences under Sections 64, 77, 308, 352, 54 of BNS.
[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and nothing is required to be recovered or discovered. Chargesheet has been filed. He submits that the applicant- accused no.1 and the complainant - victim were initially in a deep relation and thereafter, they
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
