Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
DEEPAKKUMAR MOHANLAL SACHADE (THAKKAR) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. considering the facts and circumstances (Para 2) |
| 2. fir came to be filed (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. the applicant has nothing to do (Para 5) |
| 4. the accused persons were engaging (Para 6) |
| 5. it appears from the complainant (Para 7) |
| 6. there is no direct evidence (Para 8 , 9) |
| 7. a plain reading of section 26 (Para 10 , 11) |
| 8. to make out a case against (Para 12 , 13) |
| 9. the application is allowed (Para 14 , 15) |
ORAL ORDER
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for the respondent-State. Though served, none appears for respondent no.2.
2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and with consent of learned advocate for the respective parties, matter is taken up for final disposal forthwith.
3. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”), the applicant has prayed to quash and set aside the complaint being FIR C.R. No.11192011210067 of 2021 with Bopal Police Station, Ahmedabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 406 & 420 of IPC as well as Sections 23(e), 23(f), 23(h), 23(l) of The Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1956, Sections 45(H)(A) of the Security Exchange Board of Ind
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
