SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 3560

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8305 of 2013 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK ================================================================

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed Yes
























1Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?Yes
2To be referred to the Reporter or not ?Yes
3Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?No
4Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order made thereunder ?No
================================================================

RAMABHAI RACHHODBHAI BARIA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT - THROUGH SECRETARY & ORS.

================================================================

Appearance:

MR MEHUL M MEHTA(3416) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MS MEGHA CHITALIYA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5 ================================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M.

PRACHCHHAK Date : 03/04/2024

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Present petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following reliefs:-

“(A) May be pleased to Admit and Allow this Writ petition.

(B) Be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction directing the respondents to forthwith release the following monetary benefits with 18% interest, after holding the action of the respondents in not releasing the same as arbitrary and illegal:-

(I) Arrears of pay of Workcharge Work Assistant from 1- 3-99 to 31-10-2007 after notionally promoting the petitioner as Workcharge Work Assistant w.e.f. March 1999 on completion of 10 years of service as workcharge employee and as it done in the case of junior employees to the petitioner.

(II) Revision in pension and it’s arrears with revision in retirement benefits after calculation and payments as per above mentioned 22(B)(I) prayer.

(C) be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, direction or Order quashing and setting aside the communication dated 20-9-12 passed by respondent no.3 pursuant to representation dated 17-8-12 preferred by the petitioner.

(D) Pending admission hearing and final disposal of this Writ Petition, be pleased to grant ad interim relief in terms of para 22(B) of the petition.

(E) Be pleased to pass such other / further orders deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.

(F) Be pleased to award the costs of the present Writ Petition from the respondents.”

2. Facts of the present case are in nutshell as under:-

2.1 It is the case of the petitioner that he joined the services as Security Guard w.e.f. 21.05.1075 and he had completed ten years of continuous service on 01.10.1988. The petitioner passed the S.S.C. Examination in 1989 and he had given administrative work w.e.f. 01.09.1991 because he had cleared S.S.C.

Examination. The Narmada Water Resources and Water Supply Department, State of Gujarat issued Government Resolution on 30.06.1988 and on the basis of the Government Resolution, OfÏce Order No.279 of 1998 was issued by respondent No.4.

2.2 It is the case of the petitioner that the Executive Engineer, Panam Yojna Vibhag, Godhra passed OfÏce Order No.603 of 1998 on 02.11.1998 in favour of the petitioner on the basis of the resolution dated 30.06.1988 and OfÏce Order No.279 of 1998 issued by respondent No.4. That as per the OfÏce Order No.603 of 1998, the petitioner resumed the duty as Workcharge w.e.f. 05.11.1998 and necessary entry was posted in the service book of the petitioner by respondent No.3 and entry was posted to the effect that the date of appointment as Class III, Workcharge was

01.03.1989.

2.3 It is also the case of the petitioner that as per the resolution dated 30.06.1998, the scheme was to be implemented from 01.10.1988 and the arrears of pay came to be paid to the concerned employees who were made workcharge from the date of their passing of S.S.C. Examination and paid arrears considering the retrospective effect of the scheme. At the time of passing order of appointment of the petitioner as workcharge from permanent rojamdar, on 02.11.1998, no post of workcharge was specified and subsequently, he and other employees were designated as workcharge karkoon. The respondent No.2 passed an OfÏce Order No.116 of 2007 directing the concerned to enter the cadre of the workcharge class III employees as workcharge karkoon in their service books. The respondent No.1 issued resolution in the year 2006 stipulating that the workcharge employees who completed 10 years of continuous service were to be promoted as Workcharge Work Assistant. The petitioner retired on 31.10.2007 on attaining the age of superannuation. The respondent No.3 forwarded the names of the workcharge employees including the petitioner for consideration of his case for promotion as Workcharge Work Assistant. The respondent No.2 passed OfÏce Order No.275 of 2008 directing appointment of workcharge employees as Workcharge Work Assistant from the date of completion

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top