SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 9199

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 11570 of 2024 ==========================================================

MOTIBHAI JERAMBHAI RABARI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================

Appearance:

MR KUNAL S SHAH(5282) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 26/06/2024

ORAL ORDER

Rule. Mr.Pandya, learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent State.

1. The applicant has filed this Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No.11210045241153 of 2024 registered with Pandesara Police Station, Dist.Surat for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and Section

370(A) (2) of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that, the applicant is not involved in commission of offence as alleged in the FIR and therefore, looking to the role of the applicant and nature of the alleged allegations, the applicant is required to be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable terms and conditions.

3. Per contra, learned APP appearing for the resopndent State authority opposed the present application contending that the present applicant was the owner of the premises wherein the prostitution activities were being run by other co-accused and as such the present applicant is actively involved in the offence. He, therefore, prayed to dismiss the present application.

4. Heard learned advocates for the parties and perused the record.

5. The investigation is over and the charge-sheet is also filed. The present applicant happens to be the owner of the house wherein brothal house was being run by other co-accused. Having regard to the these facts, the role attributed to the present applicant, the allegations alleged against the present applicant and nature of offence, the present application deserves consideration and accordingly stands allowed. The Applicant Accused is ordered to be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to the following conditions that the applicant shall:

(a) not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.

(b) maintain law and order and not to indulge in any criminal activities.

(c) furnish the documentary proof of complete, correct and present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and to the Trial Court at the time of executing the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the trial Court.

(d) provide contact numbers as well as the contact numbers of the sureties before the Trial Court. In case of change in such numbers inform in writing immediately to the trial Court.

(e) file an affidavit stating his immovable properties whether self acquired or ancestral with description, location and present value of such properties before the Trial Court, if any.

(f) not leave India without prior permission of the Trial Court (g) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week. If the Applicants do not possess passport, shall file an Affidavit to that effect.

6. Bail bond to be executed before the Trial Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It would be open for the Trial Court concerned to give time to furnish the solvency certificate if prayed for.

7. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Trial Court concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action according to law. The Authorities will release the Applicants forthwith only if the Applicants are not required in connection with any other offence for the time being.

8. At the trial, the concerned trial Court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court in the present order.

9. Rule is made absolute. Direct service permitted.

(M. R. MENGDEY,J)

MISHRA AMIT V.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top