SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 16085

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN, J
SHRUTIBEN KANTILAL PATEL – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR MEHUL SHARAD SHAH(773) ,Respondent Advocate: MR KAUSHAL D PANDYA(2905)

ORAL ORDER

1.Learned advocate for the petitioner, has tendered a draft amendment. Amendment is allowed in terms of the draft. Same shall be carried out forthwith.

2. By way of this petition, petitioner has prayed for direction to the respondent to correct the date of birth as 22.04.1982 instead of 22.12.1982 in the birth register, coupled with further direction to the respondent to issue fresh Birth Certificate. By the amendment, the petitioner, also seeks to challenge the communication dated 01.08.2024 issued by the Sub-Registrar, Birth & Death (Central) Office, Surat Municipal Corporation whereby, the request of the petitioner to correct the date of birth, has been rejected.

3. Mr. Mehul Sharad Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner, submitted that the correct date of birth of the petitioner is 22.04.1982; however, inadvertently, in the Birth Certificate, the same is recorded as 22.12.1982. It is submitted that the petitioner, has taken education from Surat and after her marriage, she has been staying in Canada with her family since last 24 years. It is submitted that except the Birth Certificate, in rest of the public documents, namely, the School Leaving Certificate; the Aadhar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top