SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 866

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
BHAVIK JAYESHKUMAR SHETH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR S D MOGHARIYA(11273) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORAL ORDER

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11211056250026 of 2025 registered with Surendranagar City B Division Police Station, Surendranagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 114 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence. Offence is triable by JMFC Court and no notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C has been issued to the applicant. However, the applicant is ready and willing to join the investigation. Whatever allegation of transfer of the amount is against accused No.1. Further, the applicant is not having any past antecedent. Therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. In view of the above, the applicant may be granted ant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top