SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 9722

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J
SUNIL PRABHUDAS SARVAIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
MR DIVYESH SEJPAL, MR SOAHAM JOSHI, MR YOGESH LAKHANI, MR. PRAVIN GONDALIYA

Table of Content
1. earthquake incident and casualties (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
2. defense arguments on evidence (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's evaluation of evidence (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
4. appeals allowed and conviction quashed (Para 32)

CAV JUDGMENT

1. As facts and issue involved in both the appeals are identical and both the appeals are directed against the common impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Trial Court, both these appeals are heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. By way of preferring Criminal Appeal No.973 of 2007 under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , the appellants have assailed the judgment and order of conviction dated 17.07.2007 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhidham - Kachchh in Sessions Case No.36 of 2002, whereby, the appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 304 Part-II , 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code. So far as offence under 304 Part-II IPC is concerned, the appellants are ordered to undergo 5 years' Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.30,000/- each a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top