Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J
NIKULKUMAR C. PATEL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks relief against orders (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel argues for the petitioner (Para 2) |
| 3. counsel for respondents responds (Para 3) |
| 4. petitioner acknowledges fresh notice (Para 4) |
| 5. court quashes recovery order (Para 5) |
| 6. court clarifies its position (Para 6) |
| 7. special civil application disposed (Para 7) |
ORAL ORDER
1. The present Special Civil Application is filed praying for the following reliefs :-
“(A) Your Lordship will be pleased to admit this petition.
(B) Your Lordship will be pleased to allow this petition by issuing a writ of mandamus or a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring that the common order dated 24.01.2024 passed by the respondent No.3 Black Listing the petitioner firm along with 110 other agencies for indefinite period and thereby debarring the petitioner firm from participating the tenders to be floated in future by the respondents, produced at Annexure-A to this petition, is illegal and in violation of Constitution of India , 1950 and therefore the said order may kindly be ordered to be quashed and set aside.
(C) Your Lordship will be pleased to allow this petition by issuing a writ of mandamus or a writ, order or dire
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
