HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE UMESH A. TRIVEDI, MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, JJ
THE SECRETARY – Appellant
Versus
YATINKUMAR BABUBHAI PANCHAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applications for condonation of delay (Para 1) |
| 2. administrative reasons for delay (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. deliberate inaction to delay (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. lack of satisfactory explanation (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. applications stand rejected (Para 13) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH A. TRIVEDI)
[1] These applications are filed, though no provisions are mentioned in the title under which law it is filed, praying for condonation of 328 days delay caused in preferring the applications for review of the common judgment and order dated 27.03.2023 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No.838 of 2022 and other allied matters. These applications are filed praying for condonation of delay for three of such cases out of the group determined being Letters Patent Appeal Nos.838 of 2022, 170 of 2023 and 172 of 2023 respectively.
[2] It is averred in the applications that the order passed by this Court dated 27.03.2023 was received by the Office of the applicant on 25.04.2023. It is further averred that the applicant was advised by their panel advocate to either file SLP in the Supreme Court or to file speaking to minutes with regard to rectification of the words “Revised P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.