SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 26958

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BIREN VAISHNAV, PT
RASENDRU S. PAREKH – Appellant
Versus
LALUBHA B. JADEJA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:TANNA ASSOCIATES(1410) ,Respondent Advocate: MR AR THACKER(888)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1977 of 2004 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2987 of 1988 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1979 of 2004 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3341 of 1988 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 2581 of 2004 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3341 of 1988 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR BRINGING HEIRS) NO. 1 of 2014 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 2581 of 2004 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3341 of 1988 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 2582 of 2004 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2987 of 1988 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 13 of 2005 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 14 of 2005 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 2 of 2014 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 2581 of 2004 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3341 of 1988 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI ==========================================================

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
4 Whether this case inv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top