NEUTRAL CITATION

undefined

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4004 of 2022 [On note for speaking to minutes of order dated 03/04/2024 in R/FA/4004/2022 ]

With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2019 In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4004 of 2022 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR BRINGING HEIRS) NO. 2 of 2019 In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4004 of 2022 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI Sd/-

================================================================

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see No

1	Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?	No
2	To be referred to the Reporter or not ?	Yes
3	Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?	No
4	Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order made thereunder ?	No

================================================================

DECEASED LAXMANSINH MADANJI SODHA THROUGH LH & ORS.

Versus SHANTABEN WD/O BABU VAGHARI (DEVIPUJAK) & ORS.

================================================================

Appearance:

DECEASED LITIGANT for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR NILESH M SHAH(780) for the Appellant(s) No. 1.1,1.2,1.3 MR. ALKESH N SHAH(3749) for the Defendant(s) No. 6 MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) for the Defendant(s) No. 1,4 NOTICE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 5 UNSERVED EXPIRED (N) for the Defendant(s) No. 2,3 ==========================================================

NEUTRAL CITATION

undefined

CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI Date : 09/05/2024

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. By Office Note dated 04.05.2024, it has been submitted by the Registry that in the above judgment in Question No.2 – to be referred to the Reporter or not?, inadvertently in the judgment uploaded on the Gujarat High Court website, the answer typed is ‘No’, whereas in the original signed copy, ‘Yes’ is written.

2. This Office Note is disposed of with a direction to the Registry to carry out the necessary correction by incorporating the word ‘Yes’ in the Question No.2 – to be referred to the Reporter or not?, in the above judgment dated 03.04.2024. 3. Let fresh Writ be issued.

Sd/-

(GITA GOPI, J)

CAROLINE

NEUTRAL CITATION

undefined

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4004 of 2022 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2019 In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4004 of 2022 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR BRINGING HEIRS) NO. 2 of 2019 In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4004 of 2022 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI Sd/-

================================================================

1 W hether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to seeNo

	1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?	No
	2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?	No
	3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?	No
	4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order made thereunder ?	No

================================================================

DECEASED LAXMANSINH MADANJI SODHA THROUGH LH & ORS.

Versus SHANTABEN WD/O BABU VAGHARI (DEVIPUJAK) & ORS.

================================================================

Appearance:

DECEASED LITIGANT for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR NILESH M SHAH(780) for the Appellant(s) No. 1.1,1.2,1.3 MR. ALKESH N SHAH(3749) for the Defendant(s) No. 6 MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) for the Defendant(s) No. 1,4 NOTICE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 5 UNSERVED EXPIRED (N) for the Defendant(s) No. 2,3 ================================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

NEUTRAL CITATION

undefined

Date : 03/04/2024

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. By way of this Appeal, the Appellants have challenged the judgment and award dated 03.11.2017 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.-2), Gandhidham-Kachchh in M.A.C.P. No.385 of 2012.

2.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document