Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
AJD,ACJ,BIREN VAISHNAV
AMIT MANILAL PANCHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 1 of 2023 In R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 118 of 2020 ==========================================================
HASMUKHBHAI HARMANBHAI CHAVDA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
KAUSHAL H PATEL(9328) for the PETITIONER(s) No.
1,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,2,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,3,30,31,32, 33,34,35,4,5,6,7,8,9 MR SP MAJMUDAR(3456) for the PETITIONER(s) No.
1,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,2,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,3,30,31,32, 33,34,35,4,5,6,7,8,9 ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2 MR DHAVAL G NANAVATI(2578) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 11,7 MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 10,5,6,8,9 MR SATYAM Y CHHAYA(3242) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 3 PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 12 ==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE M
The rejection of prior regularization applications under the GRUDA Act negates claims for protection against demolition notices issued by the municipal corporation.
The court determined that unauthorized construction cannot be regularized and emphasized strict compliance with municipal regulations and housing rights, rejecting the claims of the petitioners.
Majority consent in cooperative societies is binding for redevelopment under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, enabling courts to enforce compliance despite minority objections.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article