Back
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
DR. ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI, J
MOHMADSULEMAN REHMATKHAN PATHAN – Appellant
Versus
HIMANTBHAI NARANBHAI PANCHAL-PROP.M R INDUSTRIES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the immediate pressing concern is the trial court's decision on document admissibility amid ongoing civil proceedings. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. tentative admissions of evidence during trial can streamline proceedings and align with apex court directives. (Para 5) |
| 3. proper procedures ensuring the admission of evidence while allowing objections maintain the integrity and efficiency of trials. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Rule.
2. These petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arise out of the orders dated 14.07.2015 passed by the learned Judge, Small Cause Court No. 3, Ahmedabad in the applications filed by the present petitioner – original plaintiff for exhibiting the documents produced in different HRP suits filed by him. The said applications came to be rejected by the learned Court below and hence, the petitioner is before this Court.
3. Heard, learned advocate Mr. N. V. Gandhi with learned advocate Mr. Dhruvik K. Patel for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Mahesh R. Shah for the respondent.
3.1 The learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that the learned trial Judge has committed an error in not exhibiting the documents produced by the petition
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
