Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
ILESH J. VORA, J
SHAILESHGIRI RAMGAR GOUSWAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's ownership and seizure context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. lawyers' arguments regarding jurisdiction and precedents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on vehicle custody and timing. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. decision to grant release and attached conditions. (Para 10) |
ORDER
Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of respondent- State.
1. The petitioner has preferred this petition, seeking to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 and supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India so also inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with a prayer to release Muddamal Vehicle i.e. Maruti Suzuki Swift Dezire VDI car, bearing RTO registration No. GJ-02-BD-5935.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that petitioner is the owner of the aforesaid vehicle and it is duly registered with the transport department of the Government. He is, therefore, before this Court.
3. The case of the prosecution is that while the police personnels were on patrolling, they received a secret information of the vehicle in question ca
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
