Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
NIRAL R. MEHTA, J
VIRALKUMAR RAJESH PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for vehicle release. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. court's powers under articles 226 and 227 stressed. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. apex court's directives regarding seized vehicles cited. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. outcome of the application and conditions for vehicle release. (Para 10) |
ORDER
Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.
1. The petitioner has preferred this petition, seeking inter alia to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, with a prayer to release Muddamal Vehicle i.e. Maruti Swift VDI BSIV, bearing R.T.O. Registration No.DD-03-K-2652, Chasis No.MA3FNEB1500017864 and Engine No.D13A- 3103329. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that petitioner is the owner of the aforesaid vehicle and it is duly registered with the transport department of the Government. He is, therefore, before this Court.
3. The case of the prosecution is that while the police personnels were on patrolling, they received a secret information of the vehicle in que
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
