Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
SAMIR J. DAVE, J
JAVEDMIYA CHANDMIYA SAIYED/SIPAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. permission granted for representation of the original complainant. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. charges filed under various sections necessitating bail application. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments presented for and against bail regarding nature of allegations. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's observation on completed investigation justifying bail. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 5. court sets conditions for bail and rules on application. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER
1. Mr. Minhaj M. Shaikh, learned advocate states that he has received instructions to appear for and on behalf of the original complainant and sought permission to appear on behalf of the original complainant. Permission; as sought for;
2. Rule returnable forthwith. Leaned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent- State and learned advocate Mr. Minhaj Shaikh waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the original complainant.
3. The present bail application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the applicant for regular bail in connection with an FIR being I-C.R.No. 11
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
