SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
JIGARBHAI PANKAJBHAI SHAH – Appellant
Versus
NATWARSINH GANPATSINH PARMAR – Respondent


CAV ORDER

1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 3.11.2021 passed below Exh-5 in Special Civil Suit No. 262 of 2018 by learned 10th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vadodara, whereby the application preferred by the original plaintiff for interim injunction was rejected, the plaintiff has preferred this Appeal from Order under Order

43 Rule 1 of CPC.

2. The appellant is the original plaintiff and respondents are the original defendants. For the brevity and convenience, the parties are referred to herein as per the status assigned to them before the trial Court.

3. The brief facts, which emerge from the record, are as under:

3.1 The plaintiff has filed the above stated Suit for specific performance and cancellation of sale deed dated 5.7.2018 entered into between defendant Nos. 1 to 18 and 19 & 20. It is the case of the Plaintiff that defendant Nos. 1 to 7 has agreed to sell the suit land to him vide agreement to sell dated 22.8.2017 and part consideration amount was paid by the plaintiff. It is further the case of the plaintiff that it was agreed that after the revenue entry regarding legal heirs of the deceased joint owner Dilipsinh Ganpatsinh is certified in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top