SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
SUSHILABEN HARGOVANDAS RATHOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

1. Learned advocate Mr. Aamir S. Pathan waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of respondent No.2.

2. By way of present application, applicant has prayed for following relief:

“YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to call for record and proceedings of Criminal Case No.886 of 2016 from the court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad, and further be pleased to quash and set aside judgment and order dated 06.08.2018 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad in Criminal Case No.886 of 2016 as well as judgment and order dated 26.08.2019 passed by the learned City Civil and Sessions Court, Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No.505 of 2018 and further be pleased to acquit the applicant.”

3. Heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and learned APP appearing for the respondent-State.

4. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, a joint request was made by learned advocates for the respective parties that dispute between the parties is settled amicably. That, dispute was settled by the complainant by accepting amount of Rs. 3,50,000/-. Learned advocate for the respondent no.2 has produced affidavit filed by the res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top