Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
SANDEEP N. BHATT, J
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Chhatrasinh Ghemalsinh Rana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against acquittal judgement by the state. (Para 1) |
| 2. incident leading to charges against the accused, investigation procedures. (Para 2) |
| 3. article discussing the principle of reasonable doubt and concluding remarks. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final decision of the appeal, underscoring acquittal. (Para 10) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT)
1. Feeling aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order of acquittal dated 31.08.1998 passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Nadiad in Sessions Case No.90 of 1995 for the offences punishable under Sections 302 , 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the appellant – State of Gujarat has preferred this appeal as provided under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, “the Code”) inter alia challenging the judgment and order of acquittal in favour of the respondents – accused. The present appeal is abated qua respondent No.2 vide separate order dated 22.03.2022 passed by this Court.
2. Brief facts of the case are as under:
2.1 On 29.11.1994 at about 10 p.m., Village-Napa Vanta, Taluka- Borsad, District-Kheda, one Manubha Bachubhai, who was nephew of the comp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
