Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J
AMRINBANU MOHMAD ARIF – Appellant
Versus
UJJAIRBHAI IQBALBHAI MEMON – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial hearings on behalf of the applicant. (Para 1) |
| 2. background of the parties and procedural request. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. consideration of convenience in transferring family law cases. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. final verdict and operational directions on the transfer. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
1. Heard learned Advocate Ms. Raksha S. Dikshit appearing on behalf of the applicant. Though served, none appears on behalf of the respondent.
2. It appears that the respondent-husband had appeared in person before this Court on 13.10.2022 and whereas the respondent had sought for time and even though adequate time had been granted, it appears that the respondent has not engaged any learned Advocate.
3. By way of this application, the applicant has prayed for transferring of Regular Civil Case No. 37 of 2022, pending before the Court of learned Principal Civil Judge, Botad to the learned Family Court at Ahmedabad.
4. Considering the submissions made by learned Advocate Ms. Dikshit, it appears that the parties to the dispute had got married somewhere in the year 2015 and whereas from the wedlock two children are stated to be born. It also appears that later on, on account of certain dif
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
