SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
BILKISBANU (BILKISBANO) HANIFKHAN @ KALO MUNNO AMIRKHAN JATMALEK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Heard the learned advocates for the respective parties through video conferencing.

2. This application is filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “the Code”) seeking regular bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No.11211016200542 of 2020 with Dhrangadhra Taluka Police Station, District Surendranagar for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) of the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Act, 2015 (for short “the Act”).

3. Learned Senior Advocate Mr.Yatin Oza has submitted that the applicant may be released on bail since she has been wrongly roped in the aforesaid offence. He has submitted that five FIRs, which are registered against the present applicant, are clubbed together, for which separate trial will be connected, hence the applicant may not be made to suffer the rigors of the trial under the provisions of the Act. He has referred to Article 20(2) of the Constitution of India, and has submitted that no person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once and hence, the applicant may be released on bail.

3.1 Learned Senior Advocate Mr.Yatin O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top