SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
DEVANDRABHAI KANTILAL NAYAK – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

1. By way of this Criminal Appeal, present appellant has prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 20.03.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.898 of 2021 by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad and thereby cancel anticipatory bail granted by the learned Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad.

2. Heard learned APP appearing for the appellant, learned advocate appearing for the respondent No.1 and learned advocate appearing for the respondent No.2-original complainant.

3. It is submitted by learned APP appearing for the appellant that offence is punishable under the prohibition of the prevention of Atrocity Act and as per the provision of said Act, anticipatory bail is not maintainable. That there are three eye witnesses of the incident i.e. Sanjaybhai Jayantibhai Nayak (husband of the complainant), Falguniben Jethabhai Nayak (sister-in-law of the complainant) and Kamlesh Jethabhai Nayak (nephew of the complainant). All the three eye witnesses have recorded their statements, which are matching with the case of the complainant as there is a serious offence, which had been committed in assaulting and humiliating the Scheduled Caste member. Hence, it is r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top