HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
A.S. SUPEHIA, J
MAHENDRA CHAWLA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 24720 of 2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition seeks remedy for tattoo-related disqualification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. regulations on tattoos specified by recruitment guidelines. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court finds no illegality in adherence to guidelines. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. writ denied based on failure to comply with tattoo guidelines. (Para 8) |
| 5. final ruling dismisses the petition. (Para 9) |
ORDER
1. The writ petition has been filed for the following prayers:
2. The petitioner applied for the post of Constable Store Keeper (Male) in Border Security Force (BSF) on 12.07.2022 and cleared all the examinations and thereafter, he was called for Medical Examination on 17.11.2022. It is the case of the petitioner that he has not been appointed in view of a tattoo on his right forearm. After such a report was made by the Medical Board declaring him unfit in view of the tattoo, he thereafter, got the tattoo removed and accordingly, also obtained certificate dated 18.11.2022 from one M/s.Jai Bhole Tattoo. The petitioner was called for Review Medical Examination however, he was declared unfit.
3. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a resident of rural village and there is custom and tradition in the rural areas to get the tattoo on the body and when his case was rejected on the ground of tattoo, he immediately got it removed.
It is submitted that the respondents may accordingly, be directed to consider his case of appointment to the said post since tattoo was only 2/3 cm in size. Learned advocate on the contrary, has submitted that the petitioner has appeared before the Review Committee in view of the suggestion of the Medical Board to undergo the process of removal of tattoo and after he had removed the same immediately within a period of 4 days, he was examined by the Review Board.
4. The petitioner is seeking appointment to the post of Constable Store Keeper in a Disciplined Force such as BSF. The norms are already published by the Ministry of Home Affairs (Directorate General Board Security Force) in the detailed advertisement. The provision with regard to tattoo has been mentioned in paragraph No.D(d), which reads as under:
5. In the advertisement, the location and size of tattoo are already mentioned. It is also mentioned that in case of a candidate, who has undergone removal process of tattoo “prior to appearing in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.