SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 1682

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
UMESH A. TRIVEDI, J
NILKANTH VIKRAM TRIVEDI – Appellant
Versus
DEVSHRI HEMANT KUMAR SHASTRI W/O NILKANTH VIKRAM TRIVEDI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MS MEGHA JANI, MR HRIDAY BUCH
For the Respondents: MR MUKESH PATEL, MR NISHITH M PANDIT

Judgement Key Points

What is the ordinary custody arrangement for a minor child under five years?

Key Points: - Custody of minor child under five years is ordinarily with the mother unless substantial evidence proves otherwise, prioritizing child's welfare over unsubstantiated allegations (!) [p_5.1][p_8.17] - Husband failed to substantiate claims of wife's mental instability and misconduct with credible evidence; custody granted to mother [p_8.1][p_8.17] - Husband obtained child's custody through deceitful means before filing application and ex-parte injunction, which was criticized by the court [p_5.4][p_8.2][p_8.3] - Family Court's order granting custody to husband quashed; husband directed to return child to wife forthwith, with police assistance if needed [p_8.17] (!) - Evidence like medical reports and videos produced by husband had discrepancies, lacked proper certification, and were not contemporaneously relevant [p_5.15][p_8.1][p_8.3] - Wife's detailed reply denying allegations and explaining documents was not adequately considered by Family Court [p_8.53][p_8.55] - Application for declaration and injunction to retain custody held maintainable only with shown cause of action, not imaginary fears [p_8.3][p_8.45] - Husband knew wife's history since 2010, married her despite alleged issues, with no post-marriage complaints until custody dispute [p_8.1][p_8.41][p_8.46] - Visitation rights to wife previously granted but not fully observed; stay of custody restoration order rejected [p_8.10] (!)

What is the ordinary custody arrangement for a minor child under five years?


ORAL JUDGMENT

[1.0] Both these petitions arise out of the common judgment and order passed by the Judge, Family Court No.5, Ahmedabad dated 16.02.2022 below Exhs.5 and 22 in Civil Miscellaneous Application No.83 of 2021, and therefore, they are proposed to be disposed of by this common order.

[2.0] Special Civil Application No.5611 of 2022 is filed by Devshri, daughter of Hemantkumar Shastri, wife of Nilkanth Trivedi, who preferred application, Exh.22 in the aforesaid Civil Miscellaneous Application filed before the Family Court raising preliminary issue to dismiss the suit as also praying restoring custody of daughter ‘Dhanashri’ to her. Since her application, Exh.22, is rejected by the impugned common judgment and order, she has preferred the aforesaid Special Civil Application.

[2.1] Special Civil Application No.8548 of 2022 is filed by Nilkanth Vikram Trivedi, who has preferred the aforesaid Civil Miscellaneous Application before the Family Court, seeking declaration to the effect that he being the father of the minor daughter, ‘Dhanashri’, he is entitled to retain the custody of her and no other person including the respondent therein has any right to interfere with the said cust

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top