JATIN DILIPBHAI JANI vs VEERAL JATIN JANI

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J
JATIN DILIPBHAI JANI – Appellant
Versus
VEERAL JATIN JANI – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Aaditya D Bhatt
For the Respondents: Megha Jani, Arjun Joshi

Table of Content
1. consent terms and amicable settlement between parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 5)
2. judicial empowerment to waive statutory waiting period. (Para 6 , 7)
3. factors for determining waive of the waiting period. (Para 8 , 9)
4. final order for granting divorce based on consent terms. (Para 10 , 11)

ORDER

1. Learned Advocate Ms.Megha Jani appearing with learned Advocate Mr.Arjun Joshi would submit that they have instruction to appear for the respondent and would request that the Registry may be directed to accept their vakalatnama. Permission is granted. Registry to accept their vakalatnama for the respondent.

2. Heard learned Advocate Mr.Aaditya Bhatt for the petitioner and learned Advocate Ms.Megha Jani appearing with learned Advocate Mr.Arjun Joshi for the respondent.

order dated 11.11.2022 passed in Civil Misc. Application No.10/2022 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ahmedabad and whereas it appears that during the pendency of the present petition, the parties to the litigation i.e. the petitioner, being the husband and the respondent, being the wife, have arrived at an amicable settlement and whereas consent terms are presented to this Court.

4. Both the learned Ad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

HIGH COURT OF GUJARATNIKHIL S. KARIEL, JJATIN DILIPBHAI JANI – AppellantVersusVEERAL JATIN JANI – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J
JATIN DILIPBHAI JANI – Appellant
Versus
VEERAL JATIN JANI – Respondent