SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J
PRAVINBHAI BALCHANDRABHAI PREMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Asim Pandya, Vicky B Mehta
For the Respondents: Maithili D. Mehta

ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Asim Pandya, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Vicky B. Mehta, learned advocate appearing for the applicant and Ms. Maithili D. Mehta, learned APP appearing for the respondent no.1-State.

2. The brief facts of the present case are that, the applicant herein is a government servant, who was appointed as Field Supervisor in Gujarat State Land Development Corporation on 26.07.1990 and was posted at Chhotaudepur. The applicant was promoted to the post of Soil Conservation Officer w.e.f. 04.01.2017 and was posted at Dharampur of District: Valsad. At that time, he was also given the additional charge as Assistant Director, Soil Conservation, Class-II, w.e.f. 04.01.2007. The applicant in total was having duties of two districts, viz. Valsad and Navsari and also having additional charge of Asst. Director, Ahwa-Dang from 04.01.2017.

3. That multiple F.I.R.s came to be filed, the details of the said F.I.R. as stated by the applicant herein, are as follows:

3 Valsad and Dang ACB 05/2018 24/05/2018 25/01/2018 to 29/01/2018 ””

4 Valsad and Dang ACB 06/2018 24/05/2018 13/03/2018 to 17/03/2018 ””

5 Valsad and Dang ACB 07/2018 28/05/2018 01/04/2017 to 03/


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top