THAKKAR VASUDEV KANAIYALAL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J
THAKKAR VASUDEV KANAIYALAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): PARTY IN PERSON
For the Respondents: MR UDAY M JOSHI

Table of Content
1. hearing is consolidated for interconnected applications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court evaluates grounds for objections on withdrawal applications. (Para 4 , 5)
3. parties cannot choose judges; conduct must maintain decorum. (Para 6 , 8)
4. judicial discretion in cases of litigant misconduct is emphasized. (Para 7)

ORDER

Special Civil Application No. 19886 Of 2021

1. Heard Party-in-person viz. Thakkar Vasudev Kanaiyalal the petitioner, learned AGP Ms. Megha Chitaliya for the respondent – State and learned Advocate Mr. Uday M. Joshi for the respondents.

2. Since the issues are inter-connected arising from the same proceedings and between the same parties, hearing of all three matters are taken up together and whereas by this common order, the said applications are being disposed of.

3. Special Civil Application No.19886 of 2021 calls into question an order dated 30.11.2021 passed by the learned rd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vadodara, passed below Exh. 13 in Review Application No. 2 of 2021 whereby the learned Court had permitted an application by the applicants of Exh. 13 to withdraw the Review Application in spite of objections filed by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

HIGH COURT OF GUJARATNIKHIL S. KARIEL, JTHAKKAR VASUDEV KANAIYALAL – AppellantVersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J
THAKKAR VASUDEV KANAIYALAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent