ORAL ORDER

Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent-State.

By filing present application, applicant, being a child in conflict with law, through his mother has requested to release him on regular bail in connection with the FIR registered as CR No. 11202009220978 of 2022 with Jamnagar City “B” Division Police Station, District: Jamnagar by quashing and setting aside the judgment and order dated 20.07.2022 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 216 of 2022 by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge and Children’s Court, Jamnagar. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent-State.

It was submitted by leaned advocate for the applicant that the impugned judgment is unjust, unreasonable, against the provisions of law and contrary to the evidence on record. Learned Judge ought to have appreciated the fact that the applicant is an innocent person and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. There is no prima favie evidence which can connect the applicant with the crime in question. That, the applicant is falsely involved in the crime in question with an oblique motive and extraneous considerations. Ultimately, it was requested by learned advocate for the applicant to allow present application by enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

Learned APP for the respondent-State has strongly objected the submissions of the learned advocate for the applicant and submitted that the applicant is involved in the serious offence and therefore, lower court has rightly rejected the request of releasing the applicant on bail. That, the prosecution has reasonably established the involvement of the present applicant. That prima facie evidence is there to connect the applicant with the crime in question. Ultimately, it was requested by learned APP for the respondent-State to dismiss present application.

Having heard learned advocate for applicant and learned APP for the respondent-State and perusing the investigation papers produced on record, it appears that in connection with the offence being CR No. 11202009220978 of 2022 registered with Jamnagar City “B” Division Police Station, District: Jamnagar for the offence punishable under Sections 380, 454 and 457 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 65A, 65(e) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The present applicant was arrested and he is under the custody of Juvenile Justice Board, Jamnagar since 02.07.2022. It appears that the applicant is having age of

13 years and is studying in the standard 9.

This Court would like to refer Section 12(1) of the Act, which is as under:

“12. Bail to a person who is apparently a child alleged to be in conflict with law: (1) When any person, who is apparently a child and is alleged to have committed a bailable or non-bailable offence, is apprehended or detained by the police or appears or brought before a Board, such person shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or in any other law for the time being in force, be released on bail with or without surety or placed under the supervision of a probation officer or under the care of any fit person:

Provided that such person shall not be so released if there appears reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring that person into association with any known criminal or expose the said person to moral, physical or psychological danger or the persons release would defeat the ends of justice, and the Board shall record the reasons for denying the bail and circumstances that led to such a decision.

(2) When such person having been apprehended is not released on bail under sub-section (1) by the officer-in-charge of the police station, such officer shall cause the person to be kept only in an observation home in such manner as may be prescribed until the person can be brought before a Board.

(3) When such person is not released on bail under sub-section (1) by the Boar