SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 4069

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
DR. A. P. THAKER, J
NARAN RAVA KOLI & 6 other(s) – Appellant
Versus
THE COLLECTOR & 1 other(s) – Respondent
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8637 of 2008



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR VIMAL A PUROHIT
For the Respondents: MS DHWANI TRIPATHI AGP

Administrative decisions regarding land tenure must comply with government policy ensuring acquired lands are replaced with lands of the same nature.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article not specified - Land tenure - Petitioner challenged orders regarding land conversion from new tenure to old tenure based on the government's policy for agricultural land; the court found the revenue authorities committed serious errors in not adhering to the established governmental resolution for land allotments. The court emphasized that acquired land must be replaced by land of the same nature. (Paras 6-8)

(B) Natural Justice - The petitioner argued violation of natural justice principles due to lack of opportunity for hearing before adverse decisions were made, highlighting the necessity for fair consideration in administrative processes. (Paras 4.1, 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner inherited land that was converted from new to old tenure for agricultural purposes, which was then acquired by the Anjar Area Development Authority without appropriate allotment of similar tenure land in return.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the land must be of the same nature as that which was acquired and ordered the quashing of earlier decisions that failed to provide this.

Issues: The primary issues involved the nature of the land tenure following acquisition and adherence to prescribed government resolutions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that government policy mandates replacement lands for those acquired to remain of the same tenure classification, affirming that administrative decisions must respect existing regulations.

Result: Present petition is allowed.

Table of Content
1. context of land tenure and inheritance rights. (Para 3 , 4)
2. arguments surrounding the application for land tenure. (Para 5)
3. court's observations on governmental resolution applicability. (Para 6 , 7)
4. determination of error in law by revenue authorities. (Para 8)
5. outcome and direction to reconsider application based on resolution. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

JUDGEMENT

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Vimal Purohit for the petitioners and learned AGP Ms. Dhwani Tripathi for the respondent-State.

2. RULE returnable forthwith. Learned AGP Ms. Tripathi waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

With the consent of both the sides, the matter is heard finally.

3. The present petition has been preferred with the following prayers:

12.02.2008 and 21.04.2008 passed by the revenue department, state of Gujarat and the Collector, Kutch in JaMaNa/542007/2093/A and A-2/Land/Vashi/998/2008 respectively; and part of the order no. JaMaNa/5606/1346/A dated 23.02.2007 passed by the State Government as far as it directs the Collector to grant the land on new tenure basis and not on old tenure basis.

(E) Pass the order ans further order/s as deemed fit in the interest of justice.”

4. The brief facts of the petition is that the father of the present petitioner was granted land bearing survey no. 984 paiki (old survey no. 205) ad measuring acre 16-19 guntha, of village Anjarsim, Taluka as new tenure land in the year 2002. As, the father of the petitioner held that the land for more than 15 years, he applied before the Mamlatadar, Anjar in the year 2002 and got the said land converted to old tenure for agricultural purpose as per the policy of the State Government. Accordingly, the Mamlatdar of Anjar has ordered to pay Rs.1920/- for conversion of the said land into old tenure for agricultural purpose and the same was paid to the State of Gujarat on 23.09.2002. The said land got converted into the old tenure and after the death of father of the present petitioner had inherited the said land.

4.1 According to the petitioner, in the year 2004, the Anjar Area Development Authority has encroached upon the land of the petitioner on eight acers of land belonging to the petitioner.

Thereafter, it was decided to give alternative land to the petitioner. On that basis, the petitioner no.1 representation to Circle Officer of Anjar to grant the land bearing survey no.1 and survey no. 165 on old tenure basis for agricultural basis. On 29.12.2006, the Deputy Collector of Anjar, took into suo moto review the order passed by the Mamlatdar to convert the original land of the petitioner from new tenure to old tenure for agricultural purpose and confirmed the same. By order dated 23.12.2007 passed by the Revenue Department of Gujarat State lands bearing survey no.1 and survey no.165 old survey no.163 village Meghpar, ad measuring total 8 acers were granted to the petitioner in lieu of their original land, which was acquired by Anjar Area Development Authority and possession of the alternative land was handed over to the petitioners on 03.08.2007. The petitioner no.3 applied to the Collector of Kutch for treating new alternative land, as old tenure land instead of new tenure land the application was forwarded by the Collector of Kutch on 29.10.2007 for adjudication to the Deputy Secretary of Revenue Department. On 12.02.2008 the Revenue Department of State of Gujarat and on 21.04.2008 the Collector of Kutch, without affording opportunities of being heard, had rejected the application given by the petitioner. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid orders the petitioner has approached this court by way of the present petition.

4.2 Learned advocate Mr. Purohit for the petitioners has vehemently submitted that the grounds mentioned in the petition on which the impugned orders were challenged are to the effect that the impugned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top