2021 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 1306
ROHITBHAI BHIKHABHAI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
CR.MA 17702/2021
R/CR.MA/17697/2021 JUDGMENT DATED: 14/10/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 17697 of 2021
With
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 17700 of 2021
With
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 17702 of 2021
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
:
Sd/-
=======================================================
1
Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be
allowed to see the judgment ?
NO
2
To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
NO
3
Whether their Lordships wish to see the
fair copy of the judgment ?
NO
4
Whether this case involves a substantial
question of law as to the interpretation
of the Constitution of India or any
order made thereunder ?
NO
=======================================================
NILESHBHAI NATUBHAI PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
=======================================================
Appearance:
MR BM MANGUKIYA(437) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR CHETAN K PANDYA(1973) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS BELA A PRAJAPATI(1946) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MITESH AMIN, PP with MR CHINTAN DAVE APP (2) for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED(64) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
=======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 14/10/2021
COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT
1.
As the issue involved in all these applications
are similar with regard to the grant of
Page 1 of 50
R/CR.MA/17697/2021 JUDGMENT DATED: 14/10/2021
anticipatory bail, all these applications are
heard together and are being disposed of by this
common order.
2.
All these applications are filed by the concerned
applicant – accused under Section 438 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred
to as “the Code” for short), wherein the
applicants have prayed that the applicants be
granted pre-arrest bail at the time of and in the
event of arrest in connection with File No.
DCST/ENF-2/AC-6/CONFIDENTIAL/2021-22
registered
with the office of the Deputy Commissioner of
State Tax, Enforcement, Division-2, Ahmedabad.
3.
Heard learned advocate, Mr. B.M. Mangukiya
assisted by learned advocate, Mr. Chetan K. Pandya
for the applicants and learned Public Prosecutor,
Mr. Mitesh Amin assisted by learned advocate, Mr.
Chintan Dave for the respondents.
4.
Learned advocate for the applicants submitted that
the applicant viz., Nileshbhai Natubhai Patel of
Criminal Misc. Application No.17697/2021 is the
Chairman and Whole-Time Director of M/s. Madhav
Copper Limited (hereinafter referred to as “the
Company” for short), whereas the applicant viz.,
Page 2 of 50
R/CR.MA/17697/2021 JUDGMENT DATED: 14/10/2021
Divya Arvindbhai Monpara of Criminal Misc.
Application No.17700/2021 is the Director of the
said Company and the applicant viz., Rohitbhai
Bhikhabhai Chauhan of Criminal Misc. Application
No.17702/2021 is the Chairman and Whole-Time
Director of the Company. It is submitted that the
Company is a Public Limited Company listed on the
National Stock Exchange (NSE) and is governed by
the strict Rules framed by the Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and audited
accounts are required to be submitted to NSE
periodically. It is submitted that the Company of
the applicants is a producer Company which
produces the finished goods of Copper and the raw
material is acquired from the local markets and
also from the abroad and the purchases and sales
data matches, inspite of that, the allegations are
leveled by the respondents that the purchase is
not genuine one and the goods have not been moved
from the sellers to purchasers. It is submitted
that it is the case of t