Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
A.S. SUPEHIA, J
CHIEF OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
DINESHBHAI GOVINDBHAI HARIJAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common issues and facts across writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on absence of evidence for employment reinstatement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. importance of evidentiary support for labor claims. (Para 5 , 12) |
| 4. court's review of labour court's processes. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 5. final decision and remand for further consideration. (Para 11 , 14) |
JUDGEMENT
1. Since the common issue and facts are involved in the present writ petitions, the same are heard and decided analogously.
2. In the captioned writ petitions, the respondents-workmen have challenged the awards passed by Labour Court, Nadiad, wherein and whereby, the petitioner-Nagarpalika is directed to reinstate the respondent-daily wagers with continuity of service without back wages.
3. Learned advocate Mr.Mehulsharad Shah appearing for the petitioner-Nagarpalika has submitted that the award of the Labour Court suffers from non-application of mind as no evidence - either documentary or oral was produced before the Labour Court and the award is passed in favour of the respondents-employees only on conjunctures and surmises.
It is submitted that the petitioner-Nagarpalika had initially passed a Resolution No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
