SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 7717

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11390 of 2021 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN ==========================================================

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed No
























1Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?No
2To be referred to the Reporter or not ?Yes
3Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?No
4Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order made thereunder ?No
==========================================================

DIPABEN W/O DHAVAL LAXMIKANT BHATT Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================

Appearance:

MS.AVNIKA PANCHAL FOR MR VAIBHAV A VYAS(2896) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MS.SURBHI BHATI, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP(99) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3 ========================================================== CORAM:H ONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN Date : 20/10/2021

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Issue Rule, returnable forthwith. Ms.Surbhi Bhati, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. By this petition, inter alia, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought for declaration that the petitioner i.e. Dipaben Dhaval Bhatt being wife of Dhaval Laxmikant Bhatt (hereinafter referred to as “the patient” as and when the context warrants) be appointed as a guardian who is in comatose state.

3. Tersely stated are the facts:

3.1 The petitioner, is the wife of the patient i.e. Dhaval Laxmikant Bhatt. According to the petitioner, the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the patient on 20.06.1991 as per the Hindu rites and rituals at Rajkot. The petitioner is having two children, daughter Trushti Dhaval Bhatt whose date of birth is 07.06.1998 and son Tej Dhaval Bhatt whose date of birth is 28.01.2000.

3.2 On 17.07.2014, the husband of the petitioner had suffered cardiac arrest and was immediately admitted to Wockhardt Hospital, Rajkot. The heart of the patient had stopped functioning and due to intermittent stoppage of functioning of heart, the blood circulation to the brain had stopped and therefore, the patient had gone into coma and since then, is in coma. Owing to the aforesaid, the patient is not in a position to recognize anybody. The patient is unable to understand anything and not in a position to speak and/or move from the bed and is completely in a vegetative state.

3.3 According to the petitioner, she being a housewife, has the responsibility of maintaining the patient i.e. her husband and is finding it extremely difÏcult, in absence of any other resource, to maintain the family and providing adequate life support and other medical treatment to the patient who was the sole bread earner. The petitioner has incurred heavy expenses towards the medical treatment and presently also treatment is being extended, and he being in a vegetative state, one person is required to take care of him round the clock. That the petitioner has exhausted all her financial resources and she and her family, are in the state of despair, isolation and abandonment.

3.4 It is the case of the petitioner that presently, the petitioner is staying with the patient at the residence of the elder brother of the patient. The patient, is having some movable and immovable properties and some bank deposits. Since the patient is completely in the state of coma, neither the petitioner nor the patient is in a position to deal with the properties, owing to various legal impediments.

3.5 Being aggrieved, the petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition seeking declaration that she be appointed as a guardian of the patient i.e. her husband namely Dhaval Laxmikant Bhatt, who is in the state of coma and unable to take care of himself.

4. Ms.Avnika Panchal, learned advocate for Mr.Vaibhav A. Vyas, learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that the patient i.e. husband of the petitioner had suffered a cardiac arrest and owing to which he is in the state of coma. It is submitted that the patient is neither in a position to understand anything, condition to speak nor is able to move and is completely bed ridden. It is also submitted that the patient is completely in a vegetative state and unable to take care of himself. It is submitted that the patient was the sole bread earner and petitioner being the wife of the patient has no other resource and is now finding it difÏcult to maintain the patient i.e. her husband inasmuch as she is running out of funds. The petitioner since finding it difÏcult to manage the funds, it is required that she be permitted to deal with the movable and immovable properties of the patient so as to take care of the medical expenses of the patient.

4.1 It is also submitted that this Court vide order dated 03.09.2021, was kind enough to direct the respondent No.2 Collector, Rajkot to constitute a team of experts to verify the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top