SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 4045

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
FA ENTERPRISE THROUGH PROPRIETOR FATMA AHMAD BHOJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Advocate Ms. Ketki P. Jha for the petitioners, who submits that the proceedings under Section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been invoked by the complainant in Criminal Case No.773/2019 which is under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to in short as ‘the NI Act’).

2. Learned Advocate Ms. Jha submits that an order has been passed on 02.03.2020 by the learned 3rd Additional Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Bhuj-Kachchh wherein the present petitioners were to pay 15% of the cheque amount as an interim compensation within 60 days of the order. Ms. Jha submits that according to the order the amount would be Rs.14,50,000/-. It is further submitted that the petitioners could pay / deposit Rs.2,00,000/- only in compliance of the order and as the accused failed to make payment of Rs.12,50,000/-, a Distress Warrant came to be issued. Ms. Jha submits that if the Distress Warrant gets executed, the petitioners would be homeless and the property would be attached. The learned Advocate submitted that under the provisions of Section 143A of the NI Act, the discretion exercised is not by way of any mandatory order. Ms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top