SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 1231

MASHREQ BANK PSC – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK – Respondent


Advocates:
['DIGANT M POPAT', 'NANAVATI ASSOCIATES', 'PAURAMI B SHETH', 'HARSHIT S TOLIA']

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)

1 “Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.”

The above quote from the “Art of War” authored by Sun Tzu is not superlative in the context of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which confers power to the Courts to grant interim measures of protection. Section 9 is one of the most crucial and widely invoked provisions under the Act. Such measures become necessary to prevent damage to or loss of, the subject matter of the dispute in the interim period, i.e. before the final adjudication of the dispute by an Arbitral Tribunal.

2 This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, “the Act, 1996”) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (for short, “the Act, 2015”) is directed against the order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 27th November 2020 in the Civil Application No.4 of 2020 filed in the Commercial Arbitration Petition No.9 of 2020; by which the appellant came to be restrained from proceeding fur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top