Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J
GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
ISMAILBHAI FAKIRBHAI SHEIKH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges rejection of application under cpc. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. judgment reflects limited scope of revisional jurisdiction. (Para 5 , 15) |
| 3. arguments focus on evidence needed for adverse possession. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court discusses adherence to plaint formalities under cpc. (Para 12 , 13 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. court dismisses all applications. (Para 20) |
JUDGEMENT
1. As the issue involved in these applications is similar, all these applications are heard together and are being decided by this common order.
2. All these Civil Revision Applications are filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”) by the applicant – original defendant no.1, wherein the applicant – Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation has challenged the order dated 06.10.2020 passed by learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Modasa, whereby the application filed by the applicant under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Code came to be rejected.
3. Looking to the issue involved in the matters, learned advocates appearing for the parties have jointly requested that all these applications be taken up for final disposal at an admission s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
