2021 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 2484
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10492 of 2021 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI ==========================================================
1
Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2
To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3
Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
4
Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order made thereunder ?
==========================================================
ARCELORMITTAL NIPPON STEEL INDIA LTD.
Versus ESSAR BULK TERMINAL LTD.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MIHIR THAKORE, MR GOURAB BANERJEE, MR NAVIN PAHWA, SENIOR ADVOCATES assisted by MR NIRAG N PATHAK, MR RISHAB GUPTA, MR SAIRAM SUBRAMANIAN, MS SHREYA GUPTA, MS SWAGATA GHOSH, MS JUHI GUPTA, MS SALONI GUPTA, MS ARCHISMITA RAHA for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR KAPIL SIBAL, MR SAURABH SOPARKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATES assisted by MR KEYUR D GANDHI, MR MAHESH AGARWAL, MR RAHEEL PATEL, MS AMITA KATRAGADDA, MR NIZAM PASHA for NANAVATI ASSOCIATES(1375) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM:H ONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI Date : 17/08/2021 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : PER COURT)
1. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner – original applicant has challenged the order dated 16.7.2021 passed by the Commercial Court and learned 12th Additional District Judge, District and Sessions Court, Surat below interim application filed by the applicant in Commercial CMA no.2 of 2021.
As all documents including the material relied upon before the trial court is forming part of the record of this petition, we do not deem it fit to call for the original record and proceedings but to decide this petition on the basis of the record before us. The pleadings and documents which are relied upon by the parties before the trial court is part of the paper book. We have called for the original record and proceedings of IAAP 5 of 2021.
2. Following noteworthy facts emerge from the record of the petition:-
2.1 That, the parties to this petition entered into Cargo Handling Agreement (CHA) (hereinafter referred to as "the agreement") on 21.2.2011. It appears from the record that Article 15 of the said agreement stipulates that the disputes between the parties arising out of the said agreement shall be settled by way of arbitration. As per the record, several amendments were made in the said agreement. However, they are not necessary to be mentioned in this order. Record further shows that the disputes arose between the parties regarding the agreement in the month of December, 2019. The record further shows that the petitioner issued a notice to the respondent invoking the arbitration between the parties in relation to the agreement in the question on 22.11.2020. The notice dated 22.11.2020 was replied by the respondent on 30.12.2020. The petitioner herein filed a petition before this Court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for the sake of brevity) which came to be registered on 5.1.2021 before this Court as IAAP no.5 of 2021 seeking appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. On 8.1.2021, this Court (Coram: Ms. Bela M. Trivedi, J.) issued notice in IAAP no.5 of 2021. The petitioner herein filed an application under Section 9 of the Act before the Commercial Court at Surat on 15.1.2021. The said application was contested by the respondent before the Commercial Court at Surat and hearing of the said application took place before the Commercial Court at Surat from January 18, 2021.
2.2 The respondent also filed an application for interim measure as provided under