SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 7005

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
THAKOR HIRAJI SAGTHAJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI)

1. An interesting question arises in the present intra Court appeal filed by the appellants M/s. Chhaganbhai Amarsinhbhai Parmar and Ors. trader and consumers aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 28.4.2016 of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants.

2. The appellants-writ petitioners claimed in this Special Civil Application that "Poppy Capsule" is not "Poppy Straw" and, therefore, the Central Government as well as the State Government could not ban the consumption of the "Poppy Capsule" under Section 74A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (“NDPS Act” for short) and the relief was claimed by the petitioners on the anvil of Article 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India namely, Freedom of Life and Freedom of Trade.

3. The bone of contention raised by Mr.P.J.Kanabar, the learned counsel for the appellants is that "Poppy Capsule" is not a Narcotic Substance and is not covered by the definition of Narcotic Drugs under Section 2(xiv) which includes only coca leaf, cannabis (hemp), opium, "Poppy Straw" and all manufactured drugs out of such substances and sinc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top