SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LIQUIDATOR, THE KARAMSAD URBAN CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPRINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES ANAND – Respondent


C/IAAP/30/2020 CAV JUDGMENT

Page 1 of 20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/PETN. UNDER ARBITRATION ACT NO. 30 of 2020

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV

==========================================================

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the

judgment ?

YES

2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

YES

3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the

judgment ?

NO

4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to

the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order made

thereunder ?

NO

==========================================================

LIQUIDATOR, THE KARAMSAD URBAN CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD.

Versus

THE SUPRINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES ANAND

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR PREMAL S RACHH(3297) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1

MUKESHKUMAR B THAKKAR(8079) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1

KSHITIJ M AMIN(7572) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2

=========================================

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top