SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
ARJANBHAI RUMALBHAI KHAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

Though served, nobody appears on behalf of the respondent No.2. The respondent No.2 has chosen not to appear and hence there is no opposition to the present appeal.

[1] The present appeal is filed under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, by the appellants – original accused for regular bail in connection with an FIR being C.R.No.I-94 of 2019 registered with Santrampur Police Station, District: Mahisagar for the offences under Sections 302, 323, 506(2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(2)(5) of the Atrocity Act and under Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act.

[2] Learned advocate for the appellants submits that considering the nature of allegations, role attributed to the appellants, the appellants may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

[3] Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

[4] I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties. Learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not invite reasoned order.

[5]

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top