GUJARAT HIGH COURT
ARJANBHAI RUMALBHAI KHAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
Though served, nobody appears on behalf of the respondent No.2. The respondent No.2 has chosen not to appear and hence there is no opposition to the present appeal.
[1] The present appeal is filed under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, by the appellants – original accused for regular bail in connection with an FIR being C.R.No.I-94 of 2019 registered with Santrampur Police Station, District: Mahisagar for the offences under Sections 302, 323, 506(2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(2)(5) of the Atrocity Act and under Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act.
[2] Learned advocate for the appellants submits that considering the nature of allegations, role attributed to the appellants, the appellants may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
[3] Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.
[4] I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties. Learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not invite reasoned order.
[5]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.