HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J
ARVINDBHAI PREMJIBHAI JADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. anticipatory bail application context. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments for anticipatory bail. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's observations on allegations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. legal precedents influencing decision. (Para 7) |
| 5. court's final ruling on bail. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of the present application under Section
438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , the applicant-accused has prayed for anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. I – 471 of 2019 registered with Salabatpura Police Station, Surat City for the offenses punishable under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506(2), 120B and 114 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the nature of allegations are such for which custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. He further submits that the applicant will keep himself available during the course of investigation, trial also and will not flee from justice.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant on instructions states that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions including imposition of conditions with regard to powers of Investigating Agency to file an application before the competent C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.