SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
B.N. KARIA, J
DHARABHAI NAGJIBHAI BHARWAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR VINOD M GAMARA
For the Respondents: MR BHUNESH C RUPERA, MS. M.H. BHATT, APP

ORDER

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of respondent-State.

2. The brief facts are as under:

2.1 That, on 07.02.2011, respondent No.2/complainant has lodged a compliant before Dholka Police Station, District-Ahmedabad being I-C.R. No.30 of 2011 for the offence punishable under Section 306 , 506 (1),114 of the I.P.C., 1908 against the present applicants inter alia alleging that, the son of the complainant namely Jadavbhai had developed some intimacy for a girl namely Geeta who happens to be sister of the applicant/accused No.4 and the applicants/accused have felt that, Jadav had some illicit relations with Geeta and therefore, the applicants/accused had started administering threats to the Jadav and therefore, on account threats, Jadav ultimately committed suicide by hanging himself.

2.2 That, after registration of above said FIR, the investigation officer had arrested the present applicants/accused and thereafter, the present applicants/accused preferred an application for regular bail before the learned Sessions Court and the Learned Sessions Court had rejected the said bail application and thereafter, the present applican

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top