Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
UMESH A. TRIVEDI, J
HASMUKH NARABHAI SAKORIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for anticipatory bail due to fir allegations. (Para 1) |
| 2. advocates argue lack of evidence to justify arrest. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. court discusses the nature of allegations and judicial safeguards. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 4. bail conditions set forth to ensure cooperation and attendance. (Para 5 , 8) |
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in case of his arrest in connection with the FIR registered at C.R. No. III – 82 of 2018 with Vinchhiya Police Station, Rajkot for the offences punishable under Sections 65(a)(e), 116-B of the Prohibition Act .
2. Learned advocate for the applicant argues that the applicant is not named in the FIR. He is sought to be implicated only on the basis of statement of co-accused. It is further submitted that there is no criminal antecedents except the offence registered under Section
307 of IPC as pointed out by learned APP Mr. Hardik Soni.
3. The Investigating Officer is present in the Court. Mr. Hardik Soni, learned APP, after going through the papers of investigation, is not able to point out any material ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
