SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 7525

V. B. MAYANI, J
MAHESHBHAI CHUNILAL VASAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants: Hardik K. Raval
For the Respondent: K. P. Rawal

Table of Content
1. allegation of robbery and murder. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. defense arguments regarding evidence credibility. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. examination of child witness reliability. (Para 9 , 11 , 12)
4. cumulative evidence established guilt. (Para 22)
5. upholding of conviction and appeal dismissal. (Para 24 , 25)

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. B. MAYANI)

1. By way of present appeal, filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, the appellants-accused of have challenged the judgment and order of conviction dated 28.10.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gondal, in Sessions Case No.40 of 2012. The said case was registered against the appellants–accused for the offences punishable under Sections 302 , 201, 510, 460 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act . By the impugned judgment and order the appellants are convicted under Section 302 of the and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.25000/- is imposed, in default which further imprisonment of three months is order. The appellants are also convicted under Section 460 read with Section 34 of the and sentenced to undergo life im

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top