SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 1127

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
,
LABEX K.K. INTERNATIONAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER)

1. Heard Mr. Majmudar, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Shelat, learned advocate for the respondent.

2. In present petition, the petitioner has prayed, inter alia, that:-

“33(A)YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the Impugned decision dated 02.01.2019 issued by Respondent No.2 as well as quash and set aside decision of Respondent No.2 being Agenda Item No.22/15 and Agenda Item No.22/25 taken in 22nd Board of Director (BOD) meeting held on 23.08.2017;

(B) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to Respondent No.2 to amend the Acceptance Letter dated 12.01.2018 to the extent that tax per unit of the Binocular Microscope be calculated at Rs.3239.10/- [amount arrived after applying GST @ 18% to the base price of Rs.17,995/-].

(C) During the pendency and final disposal of the present petition, YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to stay the operation, implementation and execution of the Impugned decision.

3. Du

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top