SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 7592

PRAVINBHAI HANSRAJBHAI DADHANIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
['AAMIR S PATHAN', 'NOTICE SERVED', 'HS MUNSHAW', 'AMIT N PATEL', 'VINOD M GAMARA']

CAV JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A. P. THAKER)

1. This writ petition in the nature of Public Interest Litigation is preferred by the petitioners, who are agriculturists residing in Village: Sheth Vadala, which is adjoining to Village: Sukhpur, Taluka : Jamjodhpur, District: Jamnagar raising serious grievance as regards environmental pollution caused by respondent No.7 and have prayed the following reliefs:-

(A) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions and be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order passed by the respondent no. 4 granting permission (Consents & Authorization) to the respondent no. 8 & 9 in relation to the mining activities in the quarry for extracting black trap stones at Survey No. 678, Village : Sheth Vadala, Ta: Jamjodhpur, Dist: Jamnagar as the same is contrary to the observations made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mohammed Haroon Ansari & another Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District reported in AIR 2004 SC 823 as we ll as this Hon’ble Court in Yakubbhai Sharifbhai Aaglodiya Vs. Collector & District Magistrate & Anr. In Writ Petition (P.I.L.) No. 70/2011 decided on 12.03.2012 and confirmed by the Ho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top