2019 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 7592
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 162 of 2015 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: Sd/-
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT and HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A. P. THAKER ================================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to Yes
| 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? | Yes | |
| 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? | Yes | |
| 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? | No | |
| 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order made thereunder ? | No |
PRAVINBHAI HANSRAJBHAI DADHANIYA & 2 other(s)
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 8 other(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR. AAMIR S PATHAN(7142) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3 UTKARSH SHARMA, AGP (99) for the Opponent(s) No. 1, 2 and 5 MR AMIT N PATEL(2749) for the Opponent(s) No. 4 MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the Opponent(s) No. 3,6 MR MANRAJ A BAROT(6224) for the Opponent(s) No. 7,8,9 MR VINOD M GAMARA(5910) for the Opponent(s) No. 7,8,9 ================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT and HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A. P. THAKER Date : 04/09/2019
['AAMIR S PATHAN', 'NOTICE SERVED', 'HS MUNSHAW', 'AMIT N PATEL', 'VINOD M GAMARA']
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A. P. THAKER)
1. This writ petition in the nature of Public Interest Litigation is preferred by the petitioners, who are agriculturists residing in Village: Sheth Vadala, which is adjoining to Village: Sukhpur, Taluka : Jamjodhpur, District: Jamnagar raising serious grievance as regards environmental pollution caused by respondent No.7 and have prayed the following reliefs:-
(A) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions and be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order passed by the respondent no. 4 granting permission (Consents & Authorization) to the respondent no. 8 & 9 in relation to the mining activities in the quarry for extracting black trap stones at Survey No. 678, Village : Sheth Vadala, Ta: Jamjodhpur, Dist: Jamnagar as the same is contrary to the observations made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mohammed Haroon Ansari & another Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District reported in AIR 2004 SC 823 as we ll as this Hon’ble Court in Yakubbhai Sharifbhai Aaglodiya Vs. Collector & District Magistrate & Anr. In Writ Petition (P.I.L.) No. 70/2011 decided on 12.03.2012 and confirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sai Quarry & Anr. Vs. Yakubbhai Sharifbhai Aaglodiya in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 14815 of 2012 decided on 17.03.2015 providing one kilometer as a safe distance between crushing unit and residential locality and also without making any endeavor or attempt to ensure safety of human inhabitation of the adjoining area and without considering the impact of mining operations upon the agricultural fields or heath and hygiene of the locality and underground water and also in violations of the fundamental rights of the petitioner under Article 14, 19(1)(g) and Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
(B) To issue the writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or directions and be pleased to direct the Collector, Jamnagar to take appropriate steps to cancel the mining lease in question of the respondent no. 7 as the agriculturist and residents of the surrounding are facing multiple environment related problems and are exposed to serious risk and hazard to their safety on account of blasting operations and there is substantial reduction of the underground water and damage to the standing crops.
(C) To direct the respondent authorities not to allow respondent nos. 8 & 9 to carry out mining activities in Survey No. 678, Village: Sheth Vadala, Ta: Jamjodhpur, Dist: Jamnagar pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition.
(D) Grant such other and further relief(s) as deemed just and proper by this Hon’ble Court in the interest of justice.
2. The relevant facts for the purpose of deciding this writ petition could be summarized as under:
2.1 The petitioners are having their agricultural fields in the limits of Village: Sheth Vadala. That respondent Nos.8 and 9 had obtained Consent to Establishment (NOC) from respondent No.4 on 23.09.2010 as well as Consent and Authorization from respondent No.4 on 06.02.2013. It is contended that the concerned authority empowered to grant NOC and Consent and Authorization had granted the same without considering the real impact upon the standing crops of adjoining agricultural fields as well as the impact upon the health and hygiene of agriculturists / residents of the surrounding area. According to them, the concerned authorities have not taken into consideration the facts that on account of the particles of stones spread by operation of the quarry, the standing crops of the agricultural fields in the surrounding areas will be damaged. It is contended that there will be shortage of water on account of the wastage of water in the quarry. It is contended that the concerned authorities have also not taken into consideration the fact that the agricultural labourers, who are residing in the agricultural fields, will be affected by the pollutions created by the operations of the quarry leas