HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
S.H. VORA, J
SACHIN ASHOKBHAI VAGHELA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER
1. Learned advocate Mr.R.G. Barot states at bar that he has instructions to appear for the victim girl and seeks permission to file appearance. Permission is accordingly granted.
2. Learned advocate Mr.R.G. Barot confirms identity of victim girl, who is present before the Court and admits genuineness and correctness of affidavit filed through learned advocate Mr.R.G. Barot, which is ordered to be taken on record.
3. Rule. Learned A.P.P. waive service of Rule for respondent- State. The learned A.P.P. objects quashment of the present proceedings on the premise of settlement.
4. With the consent of learned advocate for the applicants and learned advocate for the victim, present applications are taken up for final disposal today.
5. By way of the present applications under Section 4 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, the ‘Code’), the applicants pray for quashing and setting aside the F.I.R. being C.R.No.I-120 of 2017 registered with Sayajiganj police station, Vadodara for the offence punishable under Sections 363 , 366 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 , 8 and 11 of the POCSO Act .
6. Learned advocate for the applicants ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.