SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J
SAIYAZMOHAMMAD GULABMOHAMMAD BAGWAN – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF MUNICIPALITIES – Respondent


For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR NK MAJMUDAR
For the Respondents:No advocates listed

Table of Content
1. claim for payment due under contract (Para 1 , 2)
2. existence of alternative remedies bars writ jurisdiction (Para 3)
3. final decision to reject the petition (Para 4)

ORDER

1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction upon the concerned respondent authority for making payment of outstanding dues of Rs. 15,57,601/- for the work already successfully undertaken and completed by the petitioner in connection with tender ID No.262801.

2. Short facts of the case are as under:

2.1. The respondent No.5-Deesa Nagarpalika had published an advertisement in the local newspaper as well as through online system for inviting tenders and for getting executed the work/development work of Gardens in Deesa and the Tender Notice No.35/2017-18 came to be published. The petitioner has submitted his Tender through online system and the petitioner had also submitted Earnest Money Deposit for the total sum of Rs.86,400/- of Mehsana Urban Co- operative Bank Ltd., Mehsana being Receipt No.0923733. The petitioner has also received an order dated 03.08.2017, passed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top