SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LALJIBHAI KANJIBHAI MANDALIA – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION) – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1. Leave to amend the prayer clause.

2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to quash the impugned warrant of authorisation and has challenged the proceedings of search initiated against the petitioner and all consequential actions taken pursuant thereto.

3. The facts as averred in the petition are that the petitioner is a high net worth individual and has been paying tax regularly and the accounts of the petitioner are being audited on a regular basis. The petitioner was looking for an avenue to invest some money. By that time, a company by the name of Goan Recreation Clubs Private Limited was in the process of setting up a new business in Goa. The said company was in need of finance for setting up its business and consequently, approached the petitioner for a loan. On the petitioner asking for some sort of security, the said company offered that another company being Royale Recreation Private Limited would give its property bearing Sub Plot No.65 admeasuring 346 square metres and Sub-Plot No.68 admeasuring 463.50 square metres, in all, admeasuring 809.50 square metres const

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top