MAHENDRASINH JORUBHA ZALA vs KANTABEN SHRIKRISHNA AGRAWAL

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
A.J. SHASTRI, J
MAHENDRASINH JORUBHA ZALA – Appellant
Versus
KANTABEN SHRIKRISHNA AGRAWAL – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR. S D MOTWANI
For the Respondents:MS TRUSHA PATEL, ADVOCATE

Table of Content
1. petition filed for certiorari regarding suit property and defendants' rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. legal arguments presented on maintainability and procedural concerns. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's observations on maintaining jurisdiction and evaluating plaint. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. decision to dismiss petition with no order as to costs. (Para 14)

ORDER

1. The present petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for the purpose of seeking following reliefs: “7(A) A writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction be issued to quash and set aside the undated order passed below Exh.31, by learned 6th Additional Civil Judge, Ahmedabad, Rural in Regular Civil Suit No.795/2016 and be pleased to further direct the learned Judge to proceed with the suit in accordance with law;

(B)

(C)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

HIGH COURT OF GUJARATA.J. SHASTRI, JMAHENDRASINH JORUBHA ZALA – AppellantVersusKANTABEN SHRIKRISHNA AGRAWAL – Respondent

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
A.J. SHASTRI, J
MAHENDRASINH JORUBHA ZALA – Appellant
Versus
KANTABEN SHRIKRISHNA AGRAWAL – Respondent